Repository logo
Article

Comparative advantage of the EU in global value chains - How important and efficient are new EU members in transition?

creativeworkseries.issn1898-1143
dc.contributor.authorGurgul, Henryk
dc.contributor.authorLach, Łukasz
dc.date.available2017-10-18T15:29:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWe suggest original modifications and extensions of the recently presented methodological developments in ex-post accounting framework in global value chains in order to obtain empirical results both for the analyzed group of ten CEE economies as well as at a country-and-sectorspecific level. The empirical results confirm that the role of the selected CEE economies in transition in creating value added with respect to the total value added in the European Union in the GVC framework was biggest in the cases of agriculture-, wood-products-, metal-production, and travel-and-tourism-related sectors. We also found that, after two decades of transition, the measures of productivity in the examined economies in 2009 were still much lower as compared to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, in the transition period, these indexes were increasing, especially after EU accession. In contrary, after two decades of transition, the measures of capital efficiency in the ten CEE economies in 2009 were comparable to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, during this period, the growth rates of these indexes were, in general, positive. However, their growth rates dropped after EU accession.
dc.description.abstractWe suggest original modifications and extensions of the recently presented methodological developments in ex-post accounting framework in global value chains in order to obtain empirical results both for the analyzed group of ten CEE economies as well as at a country-and-sectorspecific level. The empirical results confirm that the role of the selected CEE economies in transition in creating value added with respect to the total value added in the European Union in the GVC framework was biggest in the cases of agriculture-, wood-products-, metal-production, and travel-and-tourism-related sectors. We also found that, after two decades of transition, the measures of productivity in the examined economies in 2009 were still much lower as compared to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, in the transition period, these indexes were increasing, especially after EU accession. In contrary, after two decades of transition, the measures of capital efficiency in the ten CEE economies in 2009 were comparable to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, during this period, the growth rates of these indexes were, in general, positive. However, their growth rates dropped after EU accession.en
dc.description.versionwersja wydawnicza
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7494/manage.2016.17.1.21
dc.identifier.eissn2353-3617
dc.identifier.issn1898-1143
dc.identifier.nukatdd2016315075
dc.identifier.urihttps://repo.agh.edu.pl/handle/AGH/51552
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofManagerial Economics
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessotwarty dostęp
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode
dc.subjectvalue addeden
dc.subjectproductivityen
dc.subjectcapital efficiencyen
dc.subjectCEE economiesen
dc.subjectinternational input-output matricesen
dc.subjecttransitionen
dc.titleComparative advantage of the EU in global value chains - How important and efficient are new EU members in transition?en
dc.title.relatedManagerial Economicsen
dc.typeartykuł
dspace.entity.typePublication
publicationissue.issueNumberNo. 1
publicationissue.paginationpp. 21-57, [1]
publicationvolume.volumeNumberVol. 17
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication6b1ba27c-d7c3-4f92-9618-091a5f0bc3f6
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6b1ba27c-d7c3-4f92-9618-091a5f0bc3f6
relation.isJournalOfPublication03e9ebf8-d926-4461-b28b-1b176daec779

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
manage.2016.17.1.21.pdf
Size:
892.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format